🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy produced results, and revealed fresh requests had been made by mediators to resume negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Course

The foreign minister is walking a complex route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the US president claiming the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions restart.

The US president in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the forum, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by military means. He said the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Solution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the final answer to address conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this invasion."